Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Debunking Maddox: Why you should not get your 9/11 facts on a satire site.

Debunking the 'Maddox 9/11 morons' page:

Chances are, if you're reading this page then you are one of those people who tried to serve someone the Maddox 9/11 page, and in turn got served this page.

Maddox makes many people laugh with his cutting sarcasm. However, being mainly focussed on entertaining people rather than seeking the truth, he picks on the most easily discreditable works of research to serve as fodder for his satire.

As much as we acknlowledge the efforts of Dylan and his team to spread the word, Maddox correctly points out that Loose Change is a flawed documentary. What you will not hear from him, however, is that the 9/11 truth movement is also the work of dedicated researchers and experts. You might want to check out their opinions on Loose Change:

By the way, what Maddox also doesn't know is that all the documents he linked to have been rebutted a long time ago.

1) NIST article? Debunked here:
2) Popular Mechanics article? Debunked here:
And here:

If there are any Maddox fans out there who want to attack something for themselves, then sink your teeth into these videos. Warning: They don't die easy.


Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State:

9/11 The Road to Tyranny:

The fact that this man is alive... proof that there is no God.

Good eh?

So as for the idea that Dylan Avery would need to be killed, Maddox bases that on his insane idea that the U.S. government is capable of behaving like the Borg. Apparently it has a singular awareness across time and space, and they will come for you. They are all in on it, apparently.

He treats us to his delusions further by insisting that the U.S. government needs 100,000s of workers from all kinds of departments to pull off the same job that 19 Arabs did. If Americans are that incompetent, then it's time to fire them and hire, say, 100 efficient Arabs instead. No?

Let me also make clear that G.W. Bush can't be the one who ordered it. Most likely he had foreknowledge, but the planning and the details would have been beyond him. This is the work of experts, not idiots.

In order to accomplish 9/11 there only needs to be minimal CIA officer involvement - instigated by the upper ranks of corporations and cartels who stand to benefit from the resulting war - plus people to set the plane's autopilot systems. That's it. Inside job.

This is also why the rogues would find it difficult to fabricate and plant lots of stuff besides disinformation. There aren't enough of them to enact plans like total information control, assasinations and whatever else. They just cause chaos for their benefit.

Now guess what? On that same day NORAD were running top secret drills to simulate hijackings of planes which were to be flown into important targets. What a coincidence. Only a small number of people within the drill personnel are needed to reset the autopilots of the 4 planes. Either that or the planes were actually flown manually, and the secret drill the Arabs somehow knew about was used as a smokescreen to avoid detection and interception.

What Maddox fails to tell you is that there were no Arabs listed on the planes that went down on 9-11. Check the lists yourselves.

Now, if you want to invent Arabs - and then go to war over it, that makes YOU the 9/11 nutjob.

Why does the corporate media keep on at us with the damn 19 Arabs thing? Something to do with not wanting to upset their defense contractor shareholders perhaps?

So, the official story is that the Arabs all got onto planes, supposedly without any of them being put on the passenger lists. They can now fly large aircraft without necessary training - including pulling incredible maneuvers. Not only that, they manage to do it without ground control putting the plane on autopilot and stopping the entire thing. Oh yes they can, apparently.

BBC reported that some of the hijackers were found alive after the 9/11 attacks. Apparently Allah was so grateful to the hijackers that he decided to resurrect them and land them from the burning towers safely on the ground. Another example of this divine miracle is, of course, the indestructible passport, which survived the flames along with the hijackers. Then the FBI admits there was no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 9/11.

Maddox alludes to the government not having a good reason for staging 9/11. For starters, they admitted their motives one year before the event, when they published their PNAC document Rebuilding America's Defenses: on page 51, they state that 'The process of transformation, [...] is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor'.

Look who benefits from terrorism: oil industry, defense industry, construction industry, military intel, police, and politicians who want to remove civil liberties and human rights. In other words, the same people who wrote the document referenced above, many of whom are also in the Carlyle Group.

That whole thing where the government acts like it is with the people is bullshit. The people suffer, the government and certain industries grow stronger.

Why attack Afghanistan? An oil pipeline needs setting up. Why attack Iraq? To shut down their Euro oil bourse, and according to the PNAC document, to install military bases in Iraq (page 14). Defense industry makes a killing along the way. Get it now?

But here's the toughest question: would it be possible for the government of a country that planned to attack it's own citizens to get an excuse to invade Cuba, that allowed 399 African Americans to die of syphilis for a medical experiment, that involved over 30 universities in mind control experiments on innocent Americans and Canadians involving forcible administration of LSD and electroshocks, conducted hundreds of human experiments on unwilling subjects, that sent more than 2,500 soldiers to their deaths over a war based on fraudulent premises, and allowing first responders to die from asbestos poisoning after telling them the air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe, to have a high enough level of immorality to murder 3,000 people in order to invade the Middle East?

I mean, Operation NORTHWOODS is a good indicator of what was possible long ago, think about what is possible today.

Don't even get me started on the stupid dollar bill thing.

"A straw man argument is a logical fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw-man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. A straw-man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact misleading, because the opponent's actual argument has not been refuted."

Further reading:

WTC7 research
What Really Happened

unique visitor counter

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home